Get the repetitive work off your desk.
Document intake, internal search, reporting, and the handoffs between your tools. Pick one useful workflow, build it, and check whether it saves your team time.
Tell us about your workflowWe find what drives your agent costs, trace what fails, and engineer the controls production demands.
20 minutes with the Agen2ic team. A small first step, no project commitment.
Explore the engineering tipsLoad tool definitions when they are needed. Attribute spend to the call that caused it.
Bring a question, a rough idea, or the task your team is tired of doing by hand. Meet with the Agen2ic team, talk it through, and decide where to go next. Twenty minutes, five dollars, and no commitment to a larger project.
AWS Dedicated Cloud · SLAXN · Clemson Advanced Computing
You don’t need an AI roadmap to start a conversation. Show us the work that takes too long, the prototype you want to launch, or the infrastructure that keeps getting in the way.
Document intake, internal search, reporting, and the handoffs between your tools. Pick one useful workflow, build it, and check whether it saves your team time.
Tell us about your workflowCloud architecture, migrations, Kubernetes, automation, and the monitoring that makes operations manageable. Bring an existing system or plans for a new one.
Talk through the infrastructureFind the expensive calls, test the failure paths, and put limits around what an agent can do. Leave your engineers with traces, evaluations, and a system they can operate.
Explore the readiness auditSeventy-two skills were loading into context on every call. Prompt caching wasn’t working on another part of the job, and the cost monitor wasn’t running.
That changed how we build. Measure a small run first, put a hard limit on spend, and check that the monitor actually catches a problem. The diagram shows one part of that fix: loading skills only when needed.
Read the field noteThis request needs 3 skills. Loading all 72 brings the other 69 along for the ride.
Practical lessons from building and operating AI systems. Pick a situation, try a change, and see the idea at work.
When jobs hit the same rate limit, extra workers can spend their time retrying. A queue keeps the work moving without flooding the service.
Increase concurrency one step at a time. Measure completed jobs and retries, then stop adding workers when useful throughput stops improving.
All twelve jobs compete for the same service.Three jobs run. The others wait their turn.
Three reports can all read the same stale file. A useful second check looks at something independent, such as the output people actually receive.
Introduce a known defect and check whether your test catches it. Trace where each report gets its evidence before treating agreement as confirmation.
Three green reports. All reading one source.The output check catches what the reports missed.
Long jobs get interrupted. Save completed results as you go, and make restarts skip work that already succeeded.
Stop a small batch halfway through and restart it. Check that finished items stay finished and that messages, payments, or writes are not repeated.
The connection drops. The batch starts over.Saved results stay put. The batch resumes at item five.
Use a model where judgment helps. Let code handle counting, validation, and repeatable steps. Fewer model calls mean fewer tokens to pay for, and a workflow that’s easier to test and run.
Write down which steps require judgment. Keep those model calls, and move arithmetic, file handling, and known rules into ordinary code.
The model decides and calculates at every step.Code handles the fixed steps. The model reviews the content.
A dedicated engagement led by our principal architect, built around your system and the decisions ahead of you. We examine the code, trace the failures, and deliver findings your engineering team can act on.
Sample findings
Set a retry budget and timeout. Trace exhausted attempts to the originating request.
Record definition tokens per call. Load the relevant tool set on demand.
Document the controls to retain, and the evidence supporting that decision.
Read the code and follow the calls.
Attribute cost to agents and tools.
Inspect timeouts and failure paths.
Check how correctness is measured.
Deliver findings and the fix list.
Our work connects the model, the servers underneath it, and the systems people use every day.
Garrett Galloway, our principal architect, trained stop-sign detection ML for the Ford CU-ICAR Deep Orange autonomous car project and worked on Clemson’s Palmetto supercomputer. He later co-founded SLAXN and led hybrid-cloud architecture and development.
His AWS Dedicated Cloud work spans automation and operations supporting twelve services, along with engineer training and multi-team technical presentations as an Amazon Associate Speaker.
We bring that experience to the design, explain the tradeoffs, and work with your team to get the system running.
Email usA few things to know before the first call.
Twenty minutes to talk about what you’re trying to do, what gets in the way, and where our team can help. It’s a small first step with no commitment to a larger project.
If you’d rather start by email, send us a few sentences about the problem.
Yes. We can start with one process your team repeats, look at the tools and data involved, and work out whether AI or ordinary automation would help. The first step is understanding the work.
No. Before launch is a good time to test the design, measure costs, and work through what happens when a call fails.
A smaller codebase also makes it easier to inspect the design before it becomes expensive to change.
We can work with any of those. We’ll look at how your application calls the model, uses tools, handles failures, and checks the output.
Your provider affects pricing, available controls, and where data goes. Those details are part of the review.
Yes. Send it over before the intro call and we’ll sort it out before discussing sensitive details.
Cloud infrastructure, migrations, and automation are part of the work too. Tell us what you need running and we can scope it from there.
Yes. The audit includes a 60-minute readout with your engineering team, and larger projects use your repo and review process.
We document what changes and walk the team through it so they can operate it after the engagement.
Then we’ll say so. You still get the findings and a readout with your team.
The report includes what’s working and what we would leave alone.
Principal holds an active TS/SCI with polygraph.
Tell us where we met and what we were talking about. A half-formed idea is plenty to start with.
Send us a noteA short guide to budgets, realistic tests, human approval, failure recovery, and checking the result where people will use it.
Read the checklist Or book a $5 problem review ↗Bring the thing you want to figure out. We’ll help you find a useful next step.